Posttreatment follow-up is a staple of oncologic practice. Clinicians have
traditionally presumed that close surveillance improves clinical outcome. H
owever, new evidence reveals that frequent, procedure-intensive follow-up m
ay provide no more significant benefit to patients than simpler approaches.
Several recent consensus recommendations front major oncology organization
s support this theory. Published surveys of clinician and institutional fol
low-up reveal significant variations in practice, with many providers conti
nuing to use costly, unproven regimens. This review highlights current data
on follow-up care for three common cancers-breast, colorectal, and prostat
e. These data suggest an acute need for changes leading to more rational, c
onsistent, and efficient follow-up practices.