L. Coulter et al., Comparison of high spatial resolution imagery for efficient generation of GIS vegetation layers, PHOTOGR E R, 66(11), 2000, pp. 1329-1335
Traditional vegetation mapping approaches require extensive field reconnais
sance, and normally involve delineation of vegetation boundaries through in
terpretation of aerial photographs. In order to generate vegetation data la
yers within a geographic information system (GIS), boundaries must be digit
ized and georeferenced and vegetation attributes coded. A project - conduct
ed through the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Affiliated Res
earch Center at San Diego State University for Ogden Environmental and Ener
gy Services, Inc. - investigated the utility of very high spatial resolutio
n (1-m) digital multispectral image data for generating GIS vegetation laye
rs. Mapping and digital encoding of vegetation polygons was performed using
USGS color-infrared (CIR) digital orthophotographic quarter quadrangle (DO
QQ) and Airborne Data Acquisition and Registration (ADAR) 5500 imagery The
two data sources were compared in the context of a controlled experiment wh
ich tested the utility of the imagery under multiple mapping scenarios. The
study area was a habitat reserve within Marine Corps Air Station Miramar n
ear San Diego, California. This area primarily supports shrubland vegetatio
n types typical of the Mediterranean climate area of southern California.
CIR image data derived directly from multispectral digital cameras (e.g., A
DAR System 5500) enabled more accurate classification and mapping of vegeta
tion than did digital imagery generated from scanned CIR aerial photographs
. This result is largely attributed to the higher spectral and radiometric
fidelity of direct digital capture, but may also be attributed to more opti
mal seasonality for the data of the ADAR acquisition. While the mapping was
based upon interactive, visual image interpretation and on-screen digitizi
ng the following image processing techniques proved to be helpful for aidin
g interpretation:
contrast enhancement prior to generating hardcopy prints for field analyses
and during on-screen classification and digitizing,
per-pixel image classification based on spectral-radiometric pattern recogn
ition, and
derivation of normalized difference vegetation index maps.
The overall accuracy of interpreter-derived vegetation maps was approximate
ly 75 percent for the entire study area.