Several authors have tried to define segmental lumbar instability. The
ir definitions: increased antero-posterior translation, pathologic cou
pled motion, increased neutral zone, pathologic instantaneuous center
of rotation describe some mechanic findings occuring in the aging spin
e. However, there is no evidence that they help to differentiate the p
athologic entity of segmental lumbar instability from the normal aging
process. Dynamic explanation models are promising, but at the moment
they cannot be used clinically for diagnosis of instability as well. T
he most important structure to maintain lumbar stability is the interv
ertebral disc. In the third and fourth decade, more than 50 percent of
specimen show peripheral tears of the anulus. It was shown in animal
experiments that these tears develop to radial tears, which are accomp
anied by nuclear volume loss and decreased height. The facets degenera
te one or two decades later. Corresponding with the loss of discal fun
ction, they increasingly contribute to spinal stability. In conclusion
, the concept of lumbar segmental instability is not very helpful in c
linical practise. It is recommended to base the decision of lumbar fus
ion on a painful degenerated disc, and additional findings promising a
good result.