C. Chen et al., INFLUENCE OF REFERENCE ELECTRODES, STIMULATION CHARACTERISTICS AND TASK PARADIGMS ON AUDITORY P50, PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 51(3), 1997, pp. 139-143
To clarify the nature of auditory P50, middle latency auditory evoked
potentials were recorded by using different conditions of reference el
ectrodes (linked earlobes, LE; balanced non-cephalic, BN), stimulation
characteristics (tone burst, human voice) and tasks (counting, simple
reaction) in 10 right-handed males (aged 21-36 years). EEG was record
ed from Fz, Ct, Pt, C3, C4, T3 and T4 according to the 10-20 system. T
wo groups of electrode sites were made for the statistical analysis: a
midline group, Fz, Ct and Pt; and a lateral group, T3, C3, Cz, C4 and
T4. The results were that the P50 amplitudes with BN electrodes were
significantly higher than those with LE in both groups (midline, P < 0
.01; lateral, P < 0.01); the P50 amplitudes by voice stimulation were
significantly higher than those by tone stimulation in the lateral gro
up (P < 0.05), and the P50 latencies under a simple reaction paradigm
were significantly shorter than those under a counting task in both gr
oups (midline, P < 0.05; lateral, P < 0.05). These results suggest tha
t various factors including motor response affect the P50 amplitudes a
nd latencies.