S. Kjellberg et al., Knowledge of and attitudes towards infertility held by members of two county councils in Sweden, ACT OBST SC, 79(11), 2000, pp. 1015-1020
Background. To investigate Swedish county council members knowledge of the
laws regulating infertility treatment, their understanding of the suggestio
ns put forward in the report 'Priorities in Health Care' and their attitude
s towards infertility.
Methods. All members (n = 182) of the 1998 county councils of Linkoping and
Jonkoping were asked to participate in the study. In total, 153 answered t
he questionnaire.
Results. Different age groups did not show different levels of knowledge. S
imilarly, there was no significant difference between men and women concern
ing their knowledge of infertility laws. Furthermore, those committee membe
rs who were very positive towards infertility treatment did not have any be
tter knowledge of such treatment than those who were less positive. The men
and women who themselves had previously had or were dealing with infertili
ty problems at the time of the survey (12 per cent) displayed the same leve
l of knowledge as the other council members. They also expressed similar at
titudes. The members showed very little familiarity with the priority group
s suggested in the report from the Health Care Priority Committee. For exam
ple, only 18 per cent knew that this committee in priority group III placed
infertility treatment and investigation. 31.3 per cent answered that infer
tility was placed in group V, a group that does not exist. The majority sta
ted that they had a positive attitude towards the treatment of infertility.
This is indicated, for example, by their rejection of the statement 'it's
[infertility is] a luxury problem'.
Conclusions. The relative lack of knowledge of Swedish law and of the repor
t from the Health Care Priority Committee might lead to a lower level of co
mmitment to dealing with the problems that infertile couples face than if t
he members were better informed. In other words, this lack of knowledge mig
ht influence the decisions of the county council members.