A. Arslan et al., Pancreaticobiliary diseases - Comparison of 2D single-shot turbo spin-echoMR cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ACT RADIOL, 41(6), 2000, pp. 621-626
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic value of MR cholangiopancreatography (MR
CP) to that of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the
diagnosis of various obstructive and nonobstructive pancreaticobiliary dis
eases.
Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 153 patients who had unde
rgone both MRCP and ERCP. Breath-hold, heavily T2-weighted images using 2D
single-shot turbo spin-echo technique were obtained. MRCP and ERCP results
were correlated with the final clinical diagnoses. Accuracy of MRCP and ERC
P in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary diseases, detecting the cause and
site of biliary obstruction, if present, and distinguishing malignant from
benign cause of obstruction were compared.
Results: Success rates of MRCP and ERCP were 98.7% and 89.5%, respectively.
The accuracy of MRCP and ERCP in detecting the site of biliary obstruction
was 89.7% and 96.2%, and in detecting the cause of biliary obstruction 69.
2% and 71.8%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and likelihood rat
ios for positive and negative tests for MRCP and ERCP in distinguishing mal
ignant biliary obstruction from benign causes were 86.4%, 82.4%, 4.9, 0.2 a
nd 88.6%, 94.1%, 15.1, 0.1, respectively. Concordance between the two tests
was 91% (kappa coefficient 0.82, standard error of kappa 0.113, p<0.001).
In the group of nonobstructive biliary diseases, accuracy of MRCP and ERCP
in detecting cholecystolithiasis were 100% and 73.7%, and in detecting panc
reatitis 57% and 14%, respectively.
Conclusion. 2D single-shot turbo spin-echo MRCP can be performed as a compl
ement to ERCP and can replace ERCP in high-risk patients and in case of uns
uccessful cannulation.