Comparison of red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) nestling diet inold-growth and old-field longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) habitats

Citation
Jl. Hanula et Rt. Engstrom, Comparison of red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) nestling diet inold-growth and old-field longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) habitats, AM MIDL NAT, 144(2), 2000, pp. 370-376
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST
ISSN journal
00030031 → ACNP
Volume
144
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
370 - 376
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-0031(200010)144:2<370:CORW(B>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Automatic cameras were used to record adult red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoid es borealis) nest Visits with food for nestlings. Diet of nestlings on or n ear an old-growth longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) remnant in southern Georg ia was compared to that in longleaf pine stands established on old farm fie lds in western South Carolina. Diets of nestlings were expressed as percent nest visits and percent prey biomass. The method of calculating nestling d iet composition had little effect on the relative ranking of prey. Roaches (Blattaria: Blatellidae) were the most common arthropod fed to nestlings, r anging from 35-57% of the prey brought to nest cavities by adults or 55-73% of the prey biomass. Other common prey were spiders, centipedes and caterp illars. The latter were primarily larvae of coneworms (Lepidoptera: Pyralid ae, Dioryctria spp.) that bore into and feed on pine cones. Scorpions (Scor piones: Buthidae, Centruroides sp.), an unusual prey, were recorded several times at the south Georgia location. Morisita's index (C) of diet overlap showed a high degree of similarity in nestling diets among years in the old -growth remnant (C = 0.91 to 0.94), as well as a high degree of similarity in the diets of nestlings among woodpecker groups within locations and betw een old-growth and old-field habitats (C = 0.89-0.95). Our study shows that old trees on relatively undisturbed sites provide the same prey as younger trees growing on old farm fields and the relative importance of the differ ent prey was similar for both habitats.