Discussions of violence observe that dispute resolution in stateless societ
ies often involves vengeance and collective responsibility for harm. These
patterns are typically attributed to a distinctive cultural,world-view emph
asizing collectivism. Collective hostility, is also a common theme in studi
es of stateless domains,within industrial societies, where it is seen as a
social pathology: Yet vengeance can also be understood as a purposeful sanc
tion against collective aggression, rather than as a culturally prescribed
response in aggression in general. Court records from Corsica are used to a
ssess the rate at which murder was avenged, the determinants of revenge, an
d patterns in the kin relationships involved. Vengenace was rare and typica
lly occurred when the original incident involved collaboration or violence
against nondisputants. Vengeance rarely extended beyond the nuclear family:
When it did correspondingly distant kin of the original victim acted as av
engers. Moreover, selection of vengeance targets Mas based on specific acts
of solidarity, nor on abstract collective responsibility Accordingly, acts
of revenge were calibrated to demonstrate that the aggrieved family's cohe
siveness equalled that displayed by the offender's group. Viewed in this wa
y, vendettas are highly strategic yet altruistic acts-calling into question
the conventional notion that rational action is selfish.