Hd. Jho et A. Alfieri, Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: various surgical techniques and recommended steps for procedural transition, BR J NEUROS, 14(5), 2000, pp. 432-440
Various techniques in pituitary endoscopy are reviewed in the attempt to as
semble the transitional steps necessary to take a neurosurgeon from traditi
onal microscopic transsphenoidal surgery to endoscopic endonasal pituitary
surgery. The senior author's (HDJ) experiences of endonasal endoscopy in mo
re than 200 operations as well as the reports in the literature on pituitar
y endoscopy are reviewed. Two distinct advantages that an endoscope has ove
r an operating microscope are its ability to visualize through a narrow sur
gical corridor and its ability to provide angled, close-up views. An endosc
ope can be used to assist the operating microscope (endoscope-assisted micr
osurgery). Endoscopy can also be used for endonasal retractor placement whe
n microscopic surgery is preferred (endoscopic sphenoidotomy). When endonas
al endoscopy is chosen, the surgical approach can be made with a deep-trans
septal, a paraseptal, a middle turbinectomy or a middle meatal approach (en
donasal transsphenoidal endoscopy). Endonasal endoscopy can be performed vi
a either one or two nostrils. Working-channel endoscopy can be performed fo
r restricted purposes. When a neurosurgeon desires to adopt endoscopy into
pituitary surgery, the author recommends endoscope-assisted microsurgery as
the first step followed by endoscopic sphenoidotomy as a combined effort b
etween an endoscopic rhinologist and the neurosurgeon as the next step lead
ing finally to endonasal pituitary endoscopy. Various methods of transsphen
oidal endoscopy and the authors' recommendations for transitional steps are
reported based on the authors' personal experience and literature review.