Ef. Philbin et al., Socioeconomic status is an important determinant of the use of invasive procedures after acute myocardial infarction in New York State, CIRCULATION, 102(19), 2000, pp. 107-115
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background-Patient and hospital characteristics influence the use of invasi
ve cardiac procedures. Whether socioeconomic status (SES) has an influence
that is independent of these other determinants is unclear. The purpose of
the present study wits to examine the influence of household income as a me
asure of SES on the use of invasive cardiac procedures among a large group
of patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Methods and Results-We analyzed administrative discharge data from 231 nonf
ederal acute care hospitals in New York State that involved 78 698 black or
white inpatients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revi
sion, Clinical Modification code 410.XX in the principal diagnosis position
between January 1 and December 31, 1995. Household income was derived from
postal ZIP codes and census data. The use of cardiac catheterization, PTCA
, CABG, and any revascularization procedure was examined across groups stra
tified by income. Patients who resided in lower-income neighborhoods were m
ore often female or black, had a higher prevalence of coexistent illness, h
ad a higher use of Medicaid insurance, and were less often admitted to urba
n hospitals ol hospitals that provide on-site CABG and PTCA. Crude and adju
sted odds ratios for catheterization, PTCA, CABG, and any revascularization
procedure were related to income in a graded fashion. After adjustment, pa
tients in the highest quintile of income were 22% more likely to undergo ca
theterization, 74% more likely to undergo PTCA, 48% more likely to undergo
CABG, and 76% moro likely to undergo any revascularization procedure than w
ere patients in the lowest quintile. The difference in cardiac catheterizat
ion did not fully account for income-based differences in revascularization
, because income remained a significant determinant of revascularization af
ter accounting for whether a catheterization was performed. Even among pati
ents treated in hospitals that provide on-site CABC and PTCA, income was a
significant determinant of procedures,
Conclusions-Lower-income patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarct
ion are more often female or black, have more coexisting illnesses, and are
less often admitted to urban hospitals or hospitals that provide CABG and
PTCA. Even after adjustment for these and other factors, lower income is a
negative predictor of procedure use.