Criminology and genocide studies: Notes on what might have been and what still could be

Citation
Le. Day et M. Vandiver, Criminology and genocide studies: Notes on what might have been and what still could be, CRIME LAW S, 34(1), 2000, pp. 43-59
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Social Work & Social Policy
Journal title
CRIME LAW AND SOCIAL CHANGE
ISSN journal
09254994 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
43 - 59
Database
ISI
SICI code
0925-4994(200007)34:1<43:CAGSNO>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Scholars of genocide and mass killings have proposed several theories expla ining how the behaviors of governments, political leaders, and ordinary cit izens contribute to extreme violence. Many of the explanatory constructs de veloped in these theories bear a striking resemblance to core concepts of c riminology or could be readily integrated with criminological ideas. As exa mples, this paper briefly describes the ideas of Herbert Kelman, Daniel Jon ah Goldhagen, and R.J. Rummel from the perspective of criminology and exami nes their applicability the recent genocides in Bosnia and Rwanda. The conc lusion is that criminology, by largely ignoring the crime of genocide, has missed opportunities to both contribute to the field of genocide studies an d to improve the specification of its own ideas.