The purpose of this paper is to examine the traditional paradigm of interna
tional law that regulates warfare and defines criminal behavior, and examin
e how the emergence of new actors has changed the environment of armed conf
lict. The existing paradigm takes into account state actors and insurgents
who have recognizable political goals. All such combatants have some stake
in the existing international political system and some means are available
(military intervention, war crimes trials) to compel their compliance with
the law. However, new categories of combatants are emerging. They are not
connected to states, may have no political goals and are difficult to reach
or persuade with time-tested methods. Compelling or persuading them to bet
ter compliance with the law is essential to protect vulnerable populations
from their depredations. The paper concludes by identifying some contributi
ons that criminologists can make toward understanding these groups and devi
sing strategies to meet the challenge of war crimes. Those contributions by
criminologists would be equally valuable in dealing with the problem of wa
r crimes and "traditional'' combatants.