Crisis periods and apoptotic commitment: Death imprints?

Authors
Citation
Kh. Sit, Crisis periods and apoptotic commitment: Death imprints?, CURR MED CH, 7(12), 2000, pp. 1247-1254
Citations number
80
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
09298673 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1247 - 1254
Database
ISI
SICI code
0929-8673(200012)7:12<1247:CPAACD>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Crisis periods in development are critical periods of cell death that have long been suggested as "epigenetic crises" which are central to normal and abnormal embryogenesis. Under in-vitro culture conditions, there are simila r crisis periods or Hayflick limits of culture senescence. Epigenetic modul ations from CpG methylation coupled to DNA replication provide an alternate timing mechanism to the telomere/telomerase biological clock. Physiologica l cell death in both development and in in-vitro isolates is primarily apop totic. Arguments of divergent apoptotic death commitments as caspase-depend ent and -independent pathways seem to suggest that there is no possibility of a global life-and-death signal. However recent reports implicating CpG-s pecific cleavage in apoptosis implies that the powerful imprint mark that s ilences genes, protects genes from nuclease restriction, and modulates chro matin conformations, could provide a common commitment pathway of convergen ce in the death cascade. If the imprint mark were central to the apoptotic commitment, then apoptosis is Lamarckian not Darwinian.