This article describes the mechanisms of idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs
) and provides an analysis of potential methods for identifying patients at
high risk for antiepileptic idiosyncratic drug reactions. IDRs may be caus
ed by toxic metabolites, either directly or indirectly (by way of an immuno
logic response or a free radical-mediated process). Four methods to potenti
ally identify patients at high risk for AED IDRs are discussed: development
of an "at-risk" clinical profile for a particular AED; identification of b
iomarkers that measure the formation of a toxic metabolite by a previously
unrecognized bioactivation pathway for a particular AED; identification of
biomarkers indicating deficient detoxification abilities [e.g., deficient f
ree radical scavenging enzyme activities or low calculated oxidative protec
tion (COP) ratios 1 and 2]; and identification of at-risk genetic markers.
Clinical profiles for patients receiving valproic acid (VPA), felbamate (FB
M), and lamotrigine (LTG) and who are at risk for development of AED IDRs a
re presented. Patients with VPA IDRs have deficient erythrocyte glutathione
peroxidase activity, low plasma selenium concentrations, low COP1 ratios,
and low COP2 ratios compared with age-matched controls. Patients with FBM a
ssociated aplastic anemia have deficient erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase
, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione reductase activities compared
with age-matched controls. Use of at-risk clinical profiles (for VPA, FBM,
and LTG) and measurement of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity, e
rythrocyte SOD activity, and calculation of COP1 and COP2 ratios (for VPA a
nd FBM) are inexpensive, simple methods of identifying high-risk patients f
or IDRs. Research is needed to further characterize the mechanism of IDRs,
to investigate the clinical utility of free radical-scavenging enzyme activ
ity measurement and calculation of COP ratios for other AED IDRs, and to de
velop additional methods of identifying patients at high risk for AED IDRs.