Idiosyncratic reactions: New methods of identifying high-risk patients

Authors
Citation
Ta. Glauser, Idiosyncratic reactions: New methods of identifying high-risk patients, EPILEPSIA, 41, 2000, pp. S16-S29
Citations number
79
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
EPILEPSIA
ISSN journal
00139580 → ACNP
Volume
41
Year of publication
2000
Supplement
8
Pages
S16 - S29
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-9580(2000)41:<S16:IRNMOI>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
This article describes the mechanisms of idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs ) and provides an analysis of potential methods for identifying patients at high risk for antiepileptic idiosyncratic drug reactions. IDRs may be caus ed by toxic metabolites, either directly or indirectly (by way of an immuno logic response or a free radical-mediated process). Four methods to potenti ally identify patients at high risk for AED IDRs are discussed: development of an "at-risk" clinical profile for a particular AED; identification of b iomarkers that measure the formation of a toxic metabolite by a previously unrecognized bioactivation pathway for a particular AED; identification of biomarkers indicating deficient detoxification abilities [e.g., deficient f ree radical scavenging enzyme activities or low calculated oxidative protec tion (COP) ratios 1 and 2]; and identification of at-risk genetic markers. Clinical profiles for patients receiving valproic acid (VPA), felbamate (FB M), and lamotrigine (LTG) and who are at risk for development of AED IDRs a re presented. Patients with VPA IDRs have deficient erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity, low plasma selenium concentrations, low COP1 ratios, and low COP2 ratios compared with age-matched controls. Patients with FBM a ssociated aplastic anemia have deficient erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase , superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione reductase activities compared with age-matched controls. Use of at-risk clinical profiles (for VPA, FBM, and LTG) and measurement of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity, e rythrocyte SOD activity, and calculation of COP1 and COP2 ratios (for VPA a nd FBM) are inexpensive, simple methods of identifying high-risk patients f or IDRs. Research is needed to further characterize the mechanism of IDRs, to investigate the clinical utility of free radical-scavenging enzyme activ ity measurement and calculation of COP ratios for other AED IDRs, and to de velop additional methods of identifying patients at high risk for AED IDRs.