Prospective evaluation of the contribution of K-ras mutational analysis and CA 19.9 measurement to cytological diagnosis in patients with clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer

Citation
E. Urgell et al., Prospective evaluation of the contribution of K-ras mutational analysis and CA 19.9 measurement to cytological diagnosis in patients with clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer, EUR J CANC, 36(16), 2000, pp. 2069-2075
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
ISSN journal
09598049 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
16
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2069 - 2075
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-8049(200010)36:16<2069:PEOTCO>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic contribu tion of the detection of K-ins mutation and measurement of serum CA 19.9 co ncentrations to cytological diagnosis in patients with clinical suspicion o f pancreatic cancer. These patients had either the presence or absence of a pancreatic mass as determined by imaging procedures. A total of 156 consec utive patients with clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer or for confirma tion and follow-up of their chronic pancreatitis disease were included: 84 patients presenting a pancreatic mass (group 1) and 72 patients without a p ancreatic mass (group 2). K-ras mutations were detected by a restriction fr agment length polymorphism/polymerase chain reaction (RFLP/PCR) method and CA 19.9 by an immunoluminometric assay. When a pancreatic mass was present, cytology offered a high sensitivity, but with a significant number of inco nclusive results and K-ras mutational analysis offered a highly specific te st. In the absence of a pancreatic mass, CA 19.9 (cut-off 100 U/ml) increas ed the sensitivity of the diagnosis by cytology and K-ras mutational analys is did not add significant information. Thus both tests contribute to the c linical decision process when pancreatic cancer is clinically suspected and the cytological report is not conclusive. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. A ll rights reserved.