Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations

Authors
Citation
T. Coleman, Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations, FAM PRACT, 17(5), 2000, pp. 422-427
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
FAMILY PRACTICE
ISSN journal
02632136 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
422 - 427
Database
ISI
SICI code
0263-2136(200010)17:5<422:UVCFRI>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Background. Video-recording primary care consultations is an established te chnique for primary care research. Despite the widespread use of video-reco rding to help answer a variety of research questions, little is known about how this recording technique influences the findings of studies in which i t is employed. Objective. This article investigates how video-recorded consultations have been used in research and discusses how this technique may influence both t he internal and external validity of studies. Conclusion. Using video-recorded consultations for research purposes may ca use bias in the characteristics of doctors and patients who agree to partic ipate in research. There is little evidence, however, that video-recording influences the behaviour of either GPs or patients. Recommendations are mad e for researchers who are considering using video-recorded consultations in their research.