Js. Paick et al., Microsurgical single tubular epididymovasostomy: assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, FERT STERIL, 74(5), 2000, pp. 920-924
Objective: To reevaluate the role of microsurgical single tubular epididymo
vasostomy for the treatment of obstructive azoospermia in the era of intrac
ytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
Design: Retrospective clinical study.
Setting: University infertility clinic.
Patient(s): Sixty-one patients with obstructive azoospermia who underwent m
icrosurgical single tubular epididymovasostomy.
Intervention(s): Microsurgical single tubular epididymovasostomy.
Main Outcome Measure(s): The overall patency and live-birth rates and facto
rs that influenced the surgical outcome.
Result(s): The overall patency rate after surgery was 68.9% (42/61) and the
live-birth rate 31.1% (19/61). Of the 19 live-birth cases, 11 were achieve
d by natural means and 2 were achieved by conventional IVF soon after the o
peration, then subsequently by natural conception. The remaining 6 were the
result of conventional IVF after surgery. An analysis of the potential pro
gnostic factors previously associated with epididymovasostomy indicated tha
t none had a statistically significant correlation with surgical outcome. I
n cases of patency, the partners were stratifed into a younger group (21-30
years; n = 12) and an older group (31-36 years; n = 30). There was no stat
istically significant difference between the groups in the live-birth rate
regardless of the means of conception (natural versus conventional IVF).
Conclusion(s): This study demonstrates that the results obtained by microsu
rgical single tubular epididymovasostomy are comparable to those obtained w
ith the use of IVF and ICSI. Even in this era of ICSI, the option of micros
urgical single tubular epididymovasostomy should be considered because ICSI
involves surgery to retrieve sperm and complex invasive treatment of the w
ife. (Fertil Steril(R) 2000;74:920-4. 02000 by American Society for Reprodu
ctive Medicine.)