Objective: To determine the direct action of RU486 on endometrial cell prol
iferation and to differentiate whether thr antioxidant or the antiprogester
one property of RU486 is predominately responsible for its effect on cell g
rowth.
Design: In vitro study comparing the effects of RU486 (antiprogesterone and
antioxidant), reduced RU486 (antioxidant), ZK112,993 (antiprogesterone), a
nd lazaroid U74,500A (antioxidant) on endometrial cell growth. The human en
dometrial cell line EM42 was used in transient transfection assays to confi
rm the relative antiprogesterone potency of the various compounds.
Setting: Academic medical center.
Patient(s): Women presenting with pelvic pain or infertility and diagnosed
with endometriosis at time of surgery or women desiring tubal ligation with
a normal pelvis (controls).
Intervention(s): Endometrial cell cultures were treated with RU486, reduced
RU486, lazaroid U74,500A, and ZK112,993.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Tritiated thymidine incorporation was used to asse
ss cell growth. Inhibition of progesterone induction of transiently transfe
cted reporter plasmids was used to measure antiprogesterone activity of com
pounds studied.
Result(s): RU486 reduced cell growth in a dose-dependent fashion of the end
ometrial cell lines EM42 and RL95-2 and of endometrial and endometriosis ce
lls from primary culture. After being reduced, RU486 lost most of its antip
rogesterone activity but retained its antiproliferative properties. ZK112,9
93 was similar in potency to RU486 as a progesterone antagonist but did not
significantly modify endometrial cell growth. Lazaroid U74,500A was devoid
of antiprogesterone activity but was shown to be a potent antiproliferativ
e agent.
Conclusion(s): RU486 has a direct inhibitory effect on human endometrial ce
ll growth. This activity appears to be at least partly mediated through its
antioxidant property. (C)2000 by American Society for Reproductive Medicin
e.