The influence of teammates' shared mental models on team processes and perf
ormance was tested using 56 undergraduate dyads who "flew" a series of miss
ions on a personal-computer-based flight combat simulation. The authors bat
h conceptually and empirically distinguished between teammates' task- and t
eam-based mental models and indexed their convergence or "sharedness" using
individually completed paired-comparisons matrices analyzed using a networ
k-based algorithm. The results illustrated that both shared-team- and task-
based mental models related positively to subsequent team process and perfo
rmance. Furthermore, ream processes fully mediated the relationship between
mental model convergence and team effectiveness. Results are discussed in
terms of the role of shared cognitions in team effectiveness and the applic
ability of different interventions designed to achieve such convergence.