Prediction of outcome fi;om coma is a frequent and important task of neurol
ogists. It is difficult enough in adult patients and even more difficult in
children. Part I of this review considers some of the methodological probl
ems and caveats besetting clinical research in this field: the very definit
ion of coma, definition of the study population and outcome variables, stud
y design, the fallacy of self-fulfilling prophecy, early death rate from no
nneurologic causes resulting in low statistical power, and invalid attempts
to compensate for that by combining outcome categories, lumping together a
ge groups, short and inhomogeneous follow-up, and failure to provide confid
ence intervals. Part II reviews the clinical pediatric coma-prognosis liter
ature, first according to etiology and then according to electrodiagnostic
tests.