Hb. Rothenhausler et al., Treatment of depression with methylphenidate in patients difficult to weanfrom mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit, J CLIN PSY, 61(10), 2000, pp. 750-755
Background: Mechanical ventilation is often required to support patients in
the intensive care unit (ICU) with life-threatening cardiovascular, respir
atory, or neuromuscular disorders. Occasionally, difficulties related to we
aning patients from this support occur owing to depression. The traditional
and newer-generation antidepressant drugs have a relatively long latency o
f response that interferes with rehabilitation attempts in the ICU. Psychos
timulants such as methylphenidate show a rapid onset of antidepressant acti
vity and a benign side effect profile.
Method: As consulting psychiatrists in the consultation-liaison service of
a university hospital, we treated 7 patients with complex ICU courses prese
nting prolonged mechanical ventilation and psychomotor retardation associat
ed with markedly depressed mood (DSM-IV criteria) by giving them methylphen
idate. Methylphenidate was started on the first day at a dose of 2.5 mg p.o
. in the morning and was increased by 2.5 mg each day with twice-a-day dosi
ng in the morning and at noon until the patient responded or showed side ef
fects. A maximum dose of 15 mg/day was not exceeded. Outcome evaluation was
performed using the Clinical Global Impressions scale.
Results: Five (71%) of 7 patients showed marked or moderate improvement in
mood and activity within 3 to 4 days, and discontinuation of ventilator sup
port was achieved within 8 to 14 days. Side effects with these 5 patients w
ere not encountered. Of the remaining 2 patients (29%), 1 developed psychom
otor agitation and anxiety within 4 days. Another patient showed only minim
al improvement with regard to activity.
Conclusion: Methylphenidate might be a rapidly effective and safe treatment
for depression in difficult-to-wean patients hospitalized for life threate
ning medical illness in the ICU. Implications for future research for this
population of patients warrant formal randomized, prospective, clinical cas
e-control evaluation.