Effects of spinal manipulative therapy on autonomic activity and the cardiovascular system: A case study using the electrocardiogram and arterial tonometry
Md. Driscoll et Mj. Hall, Effects of spinal manipulative therapy on autonomic activity and the cardiovascular system: A case study using the electrocardiogram and arterial tonometry, J MANIP PHY, 23(8), 2000, pp. 545-550
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS
Objective: To determine if there is alteration in the autonomic nervous and
cardiovascular systems after. chiropractic manipulative therapy (CMT). A n
ovel approach was used to quantitatively plc,be for changes in the activity
of the autonomic nervous system, in blood pressure, and in pressure pulse
transmission time. This approach uses the electrocardiogram and arterial to
nometry equipment.
Design: This case study involves 1 subject treated over a 6-week period (2
visits/week). Respiration, electrocardiogram,:and loft and light radial art
ery blood pressures were measured during the baseline (2 visits) and treatm
ent (10 visits) phases. Measurements were obtained before (n = 3) and after
(n = 3) a break period (baseline) or before: and after CMT. High-velocity,
low-amplitude CMT that produced joint cavitation was used.
Setting: The study was performed at the Parker College Research Institute i
n a temperature-controlled laboratory.
Main Outcome Measures: Fourier analysis was performed on the electrocardiog
ram-determined rest-redistribution intervals. The low frequency power betwe
en 0.04 to 0.15 Hz and the high frequency power between 0.15 to 0.40 Hz rep
resent the activity of the sympathetic anti parasympathetic nervous systems
, respectively. The main outcome measure was the sympathovagal index, which
is determined from the ratio of low frequency to high frequency. The arter
ial pressure and the time for pressure pulses to travel from the heart to t
he radial artery recording sites (pressure pulse transmission time) were st
udied. Differences (average of 3 measurements after treatment minus measure
ments before treatment) for each variable were calculated.
Results: After the ist CMT treatment, the difference between treatment and
baseline decreased for both the low frequency/high frequency (-2.804 +/- 1.
273) and low frequency power (-0.135 +/- 0.056). These findings indicated t
hat the parasympathetic nervous system predominated the sympathetic nervous
system. After the 3rd, 3th, 6th, and 9th treatment, the difference between
treatment and baseline increased for low frequency/high frequency (0.908 /- 0338, 2.313 +/- 0.300, 2.776 +/- 1.102, and 0.988 +/- 0.269, respectivel
y) and indicated that the sympathetic nervous system predominated the paras
ympathetic nervous system In addition, the difference between treatment and
baseline for the pressure pulse transmission time decreased bilaterally af
ter die 4th treatment (left, -13.52 +/- 3.70 ms; right, -9.75 +/- 3.76 ms)
and 6th treatment (left, -9.53 +/- 3.60 ms; right, -9.24 +/- 3.50 ms), whic
h indicated that arterial compliance had decreased. Furthermore, after the
6th treatment, the difference between treatment and baseline fur the rest-r
edistribution interval time decreased (-0.084 +/- 0.014 s). The difference
between treatment and baseline for the systolic, diastolic, and mean arteri
al pressure for the above-mentioned treatments was not considered significa
nt.
Conclusion: This case study is the first to attempt to use electrocardiogra
m and arterial tonometry data to study the effects of CMT on the autonomic
nervous and cardiovascular systems over an extended period of time. These d
evices allowed a more in-depth study of the cardiovascular and autonomic ch
anges associated with CMT. Although changes in the autonomic nervous and ca
rdiovascular systems can be detected, further development of a reliable and
reproducible experimental protocol is required before validating the effec
ts of CMT on these systems.