Protocol for monitoring standing crop in grasslands using visual obstruction

Citation
L. Benkobi et al., Protocol for monitoring standing crop in grasslands using visual obstruction, J RANGE MAN, 53(6), 2000, pp. 627-633
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
0022409X → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
627 - 633
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-409X(200011)53:6<627:PFMSCI>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Assessment of standing crop on grasslands using a visual obstruction techni que provides valuable information to help plan livestock grazing management and indicate the status of wildlife habitat. The objectives of this study were to: (1) develop a simple regression model using easily measured visual obstruction to estimate standing crop on sandy lowland range sites in the Nebraska Sandhills, (2) provide sampling and monitoring suggestions in the use of visual obstruction on this grassland type, and (3) compare the visua l obstruction technique to the standard clip and weigh procedure. Visual ob struction precisely predicted average standing crop dry weights for the san dy lowland range sites (r(2) = 0.88). A prediction accuracy of +/- 295 kg h a(-1) was found using a test data set. Two sampling options (A and B) were evaluated using a 2-stage sampling protocol. Option A (1 transect/quarter s ection) provided more precise estimates applicable to extensive grasslands than option B. However, option A was not applicable to a section (259 ha) o r a Few sections. Option B (3 transects/section) provided estimates applica ble to each section and to the entire area, but it required more intensive sampling than option A to attain the same precision. The visual obstruction technique provided more precise estimates of standing crop than the standa rd clip and weigh technique when clipping and weighing up to 6 plots per tr ansect. When 7 or more clipped and weighed plots per transect were sampled, standing crop estimates were more precise than using visual obstruction re adings. However, since 20 visual obstruction readings/transect (25 minutes) can be sampled in about half the time spent clipping and weighing 6 plots/ transect (45 minutes), visual obstruction in combination with a previously estimated regression model provides a simple, reliable, and cost effective alternative to the clip and weigh technique. Regression models should be de veloped for other grassland types following the methodology described in th is paper.