I. Khostanteen et al., Fibromyalgia: Can one distinguish it from simulation? An observer-blind controlled study, J RHEUMATOL, 27(11), 2000, pp. 2671-2676
Objective. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess reliabilit
y and accuracy in identification of fibromyalgia (FM), motivated simulation
, and normal controls.
Methods. Eight female subjects with chronic FM were age matched with 19 hea
lthy female volunteers. The volunteers were randomized to a financially mot
ivated "simulator" group who were paid to simulate FM, or to a "normal cont
rol" group, Examiners under blinded conditions rated tender and control poi
nts, and illness behavior. Intraclass correlation coefficients and F values
showed that counts of tender points significantly discriminated the 3 grou
ps. Variance was mostly due to experimental groups and not to observer or e
rror factors. Ln this study, simulators could not be discriminated from nor
mals or FM subjects on the basis of tenderness at "control points." Examine
r ratings of illness behavior (UAB), and subjects' self-ratings for pain sh
owed that FM subjects had the highest scores, normals the lowest, and simul
ators had mean scores midway between the mean FM and simulator. On grip str
ength, the normals obtained the highest scores, the simulators the lowest,
and the FM subjects had scores midway between those of the other 2 groups.
Diagnostic accuracy of the blinded examiners in distinguishing FM from simu
lators and from normals was 80%, and for correct diagnosis the kappa value
was significant at 0.69. Despite this, simulators were misidentified as FM
in 1/3 of judgments, and FM was misidentified as simulators in 1/5 of judgm
ents.
Conclusion. Under randomized blinded conditions, examiners using the Americ
an College of Rheumatology criteria for FM and other bedside observations a
re able to distinguish chronic FM, normal individuals, and motivated simula
tors with 80% accuracy, with a good level of agreement and reliability in t
ender point counts. Our results do not provide a "test for malingering," an
d it is likely that an important minority of motivated simulators and of FM
subjects will be misidentified.