Effects of relative phase and frequency spacing on the detection of three-component amplitude modulation

Authors
Citation
Bcj. Moore et A. Sek, Effects of relative phase and frequency spacing on the detection of three-component amplitude modulation, J ACOUST SO, 108(5), 2000, pp. 2337-2344
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary,"Optics & Acoustics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
ISSN journal
00014966 → ACNP
Volume
108
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Part
1
Pages
2337 - 2344
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-4966(200011)108:5<2337:EORPAF>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
These experiments explored the effect of relative modulator phase on the de tection of a three-component modulator applied to a 4000-Hz sinusoidal carr ier with a level of 70 dB SPL. The central modulator component had a freque ncy of 50 Hz, and the two other components had frequencies of 50+/-5, 10, 2 5, 30, or 35 Hz. Thus, the modulator waveform was always periodic. Each mod ulator component had the same modulation index, m. The relative phases of t he components were chosen to give a variety of modulation waveforms differi ng in the ratio of maximum to minimum value (max-min) and in crest factor. In experiment 1, modulation detection thresholds were measured by varying m , using an adaptive two-interval forced-choice procedure. Thresholds were f ound to be independent of relative modulator phase and of the frequency spa cing of the components. In experiment 2, detectability (d') of the modulati on was measured for several fixed values of m. Detectability was found to b e independent of relative modulator phase and of the frequency spacing of t he components. The results are not consistent with the idea that modulation detection thresholds are determined by the max-min value or crest factor o f the envelope, The results are consistent with a model which assumes that the stimuli are subjected to a nonlinearity, and thresholds are determined by the root-mean-square value (or the mean square value) of the ac componen t of the envelope, following this nonlinearity. The nonlinearity may partly reflect compression on the basilar membrane, but other nonlinearities may be involved. This model can also explain some aspects of earlier results on the sensitivity to relative modulator phase CE. A. Strickland and N. F. Vi emeister, J. Acoust. Sec. Am. 99, 3638-3646 (1996)]. (C) 2000 Acoustical So ciety of America [S0001-4966(00)01411-9].