Pa. Chiale et al., Lidocaine-sensitive atrial tachycardia - Lidocaine-sensitive, rate-related, repetitive atrial tachycardia: A new arrhythmogenic syndrome, J AM COL C, 36(5), 2000, pp. 1637-1645
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to report a variety of atrial tachyca
rdia that might be caused by an unusual electrophysiologic substrate.
BACKGROUND The mechanism of atrial tachycardias is attributed to re-entry,
abnormal automaticity or triggered activity, based on their electropharmaco
logical responses. A rate-related and lidocaine-sensitive atrial tachycardi
a has not been reported.
METHODS Eight patients (3 women and 5 men, aged 14 to 60 years) with repeti
tive, uniform atrial tachycardias were studied. In six patients the arrhyth
mia had been refractory to at least three antiarrhythmic agents (class 1A a
nd C sodium channel blockers, amiodarone, beta-adrenergic blocking agents,
verapamil, digoxin). Conventional electrocardiograms, Holter recordings and
B mode echocardiograms were performed in each patient. Intravenous lidocai
ne and verapamil were tested in the eight patients. Six patients underwent
an electrophysiologic study.
RESULTS The baseline electrocardiogram showed nearly incessant runs of atri
al tachycardia in all patients. The mean atrial ectopic cycle length ranged
from 376 to 502 ms. In seven patients a progressive prolongation of the cy
cle length from the beginning to the end of the salves was documented. The
arrhythmia. was suppressed by increments of sinus node rate and by atrial p
acing at cycle lengths longer than that of the atrial tachycardia. In all p
atients the arrhythmia was abolished by intravenous lidocaine, whereas intr
avenous verapamil was ineffective. Four symptomatic patients were successfu
lly treated with radiofrequency ablation of the ectopic focus, and two pati
ents were treated with oral mexiletine.
CONCLUSIONS The peculiar electropharmacological responses of this arrhythmi
a suggest an uncommon underlying mechanism that remains to be elucidated. (
C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiology.