CONSENSUS ON THE USE OF NEUTROPHIL-STIMULATING HEMATOPOIETIC GROWTH-FACTORS IN CLINICAL-PRACTICE - AN INTERNATIONAL VIEWPOINT

Citation
Jj. Rusthoven et al., CONSENSUS ON THE USE OF NEUTROPHIL-STIMULATING HEMATOPOIETIC GROWTH-FACTORS IN CLINICAL-PRACTICE - AN INTERNATIONAL VIEWPOINT, International journal of antimicrobial agents, 8(4), 1997, pp. 263-275
Citations number
65
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology,"Pharmacology & Pharmacy
ISSN journal
09248579
Volume
8
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
263 - 275
Database
ISI
SICI code
0924-8579(1997)8:4<263:COTUON>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Hematopoietic growth factors (CSFs) are now available for use in patie nts with myelosuppression due to congenital, acquired and therapy-indu ced conditions. Variations in the use of granulocyte colony-stimulatin g factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in different countries are due to differences in approved ind ications by national regulatory agencies, varying opinions on the impo rtance of certain treatment outcomes, differences in the selection of published and unpublished evidence of efficacy and the impact of the c ost of these agents in different health care systems. Through Medline searches and personal files, we have reviewed the published literature on the efficacy and cost of GM-CSF and G-CSF in patients with severe chronic neutropenia and those receiving standard dose chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy requiring bone marrow reconstitution. Guideline s were established with regard to (1) the relative merits of different types of clinical studies and (2) the relative importance of differen t clinical outcomes as reported in these studies. The cost implication s of these agents as they apply to the different clinical settings are also reviewed. Recommendations for the use of G-CSF and/or GM-CSF inc lude: (1) the prevention of recurrent, debilitating infections in pati ents with severe chronic neutropenia; and (2) the maintaining of dose- intensity of potentially curative, standard-dose chemotherapy. While G -CSF and/or GM-CSF have been shown to improve secondary outcomes in hi gher-than-standard dose-intensive therapy, further studies are needed to test whether such improvements also lead to significant improvement s in survival and/or quality of life. These recommendations are based on the collective interpretation of the presented evidence by an inter national group of investigators in this area. (C) 1997 Elsevier Scienc e B.V.