Although roles have been proposed for both graphomotor speed and learning i
n the execution of Digit Symbol, few data have been available concerning pe
rformance across the adult lifespan on the Symbol Copy, paired associates,
or free recall measures derived from Digit Symbol and recommended in the WA
IS-R-NI. We report findings on 177 healthy older adults (ages 50-90), provi
ding normative data by age group, education level, and gender. As previousl
y reported, Digit Symbol scores decline steeply with age (r = -.64). Symbol
Copy speed declines almost as steeply (r = -.58). Incidental learning, how
ever, declines only modestly (r = -.26 on both measures). Symbol Copy is a
far stronger correlate of Digit Symbol (r- =.72) than are paired associates
or free recall (r =.26 and r- =.28, respectively). The 2 incidental learni
ng measures do, however, offer valuable supplementary information as part o
f a comprehensive individual assessment. When low Digit Symbol scores are p
roduced by slowing on Symbol Copy, further evaluation of perceptual and mot
or speed and dexterity are indicated. When low incidental learning scores a
re obtained, further evaluation of memory is warranted. Qualitative analysi
s of errors (e.g., rotations) made on the incidental learning procedures ma
y also be valuable.