Objective: Clinical lung transplantation has been limited by availability o
f suitable cadaveric donor lungs. Living donor lobectomy provides right and
left lower lobes from a pair of living donors for each recipient. We revie
wed our experience with living donor lobectomy from July 1994 to February 2
000.
Methods: Sixty-two donor lobectomies were performed. The hospital and outpa
tient records of these 62 donors were retrospectively analyzed to examine t
he incidence of perioperative complications.
Results: Twenty-four (38.7%) of 62 donors had no perioperative complication
s and had a median length of hospital stay of 5.0 days. Thirty-eight (61.3%
) of 62 donors had postoperative complications. Twelve major complications
occurred in 10 patients and included pleural effusions necessitating draina
ge (n = 4), bronchial stump fistulas (n = 3), bilobectomy (n = 1), hemorrha
ge necessitating red cell transfusion (n = 1), phrenic nerve injury (n = 1)
, atrial flutter ultimately necessitating electrophysiologic ablation (n =
1), and bronchial stricture necessitating dilatation (n = 1). These 38 dono
rs had 55 minor complications including persistent air leaks (n = 9), peric
arditis (n = 9), pneumonia (n = 8), arrhythmia (n = 7), transient hypotensi
on necessitating fluid resuscitation (n = 4), atelectasis (n = 3), ileus (n
= 3), subcutaneous emphysema (n = 3), urinary tract infections (n = 2), lo
culated pleural effusions (n = 2), transfusion (n = 2), Clostridium diffici
le colitis (n = 1), puncture of a saline breast implant (n = 1), and severe
contact dermatitis secondary to adhesive tape (n = 1). There were no posto
perative deaths and only 1 donor required surgical re-exploration.
Conclusions: Living donor lobectomy can be performed with low mortality and
remains an important alternative for potential recipients unable to wait f
or cadaveric lung allografts. However, morbidity is high and must be consid
ered when potential living donors are being counseled.