Selection of a cardiac surgery provider in the managed care era

Citation
Dm. Shahian et al., Selection of a cardiac surgery provider in the managed care era, J THOR SURG, 120(5), 2000, pp. 978-989
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
00225223 → ACNP
Volume
120
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
978 - 989
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5223(200011)120:5<978:SOACSP>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Objective: Many health planners promote the use of competition to contain c ost and improve quality of care. Using a standard econometric model, we exa mined the evidence for "value-based" cardiac surgery provider selection in eastern Massachusetts, where there is significant competition and managed c are penetration. Methods: McFadden's conditional logit model was used to study cardiac surge ry provider selection among 6952 patients and eight metropolitan Boston hos pitals in 1997. Hospital predictor variables included beds, cardiac surgery case volume, objective clinical and financial performance, reputation (per cent out-of-state referrals, cardiac residency program), distance from pati ent's home to hospital, and historical referral patterns. Subgroup analyses were performed for each major payer category. Results: Distance from patient's home to hospital (odds ratio 0.90; P = .00 0) and the historical referral pattern from each patient's hometown (z = 45 .305; P = .000) were important predictors in all models. A cardiac surgery residency enhanced the probability of selection (odds ratio 5.25; P = .000) , as did percent out-of-state referrals (odds ratio 1.10; P = .001). Higher mortality rates were associated with decreased probability of selection (o dds ratio 0.51; P = .027), but higher length of stay was paradoxically asso ciated with greater probability (odds ratio 1.72; P = .000). Total hospital costs were irrelevant (odds ratio 1.00; P = .179). When analyzed by payer subgroup, Medicare patients appeared to select hospitals with both low mort ality (odds ratio 0.43; P = .176) and short length of stay (odds ratio 0.76 ; P = .213), although the results did not achieve statistical significance. The commercial managed care subgroup exhibited the least "value-based" beh avior. The odds ratio for length of stay was the highest of any group (odds ratio = 2.589; P = .000) and there was a subset of hospitals for which hig her mortality was actually associated with greater likelihood of selection. Conclusions: The observable determinants of cardiac surgery provider select ion are related to hospital reputation, historical referral patterns, and p atient proximity, not objective clinical or cost performance. The paradoxic behavior of commercial managed care probably results from unobserved choic e factors that are not primarily based on objective provider performance.