Wj. Poehner et al., A homozygous deletion in RPE65 in a small Sardinian family with autosomal recessive retinal dystrophy, MOL VIS, 6(24), 2000, pp. 192-198
PURPOSE: We have been engaged in an ongoing study to screen candidate genes
for mutations in small families with various forms of autosomal recessive
retinal dystrophy. Here we report the screening of a cohort of 14 families
from Sardinia for mutations in the genes encoding the alpha- and beta-subun
its of cGMP-phosphodiesterase and RPE65 (PDE6A, PDE6B, and RPE65).
METHODS: Haplotype analysis was performed on each family using simple seque
nce repeat markers closely flanking or within each of the three gene candid
ates. For families in which a gene could not be ruled out from segregating
with disease, exons of the gene from proband DNAs were screened for mutatio
ns by SSCPE (single strand conformation polymorphism electrophoresis). All
variants found by SSCPE were sequenced directly.
RESULTS: By haplotype analysis, 6/14, 11/14, and 4/13 families were ruled o
ut for PDE6A, PDE6B, and RPE65, respectively. A few variants were found in
the proband DNAs of the remaining families, but only one was significant: a
20 bp deletion in exon 4 of RPE65. The deletion co-segregated with disease
in one family and caused a frame shift that produces a stop codon downstre
am. It was absent from the other Sardinian families that we tested, and fro
m Sardinian and North American controls. Results of studies of phenotype in
homozygotes and heterozygotes in this Sardinian family are compared with t
hose from a non-Sardinian family recently reported to have the same RPE65 m
utation.
CONCLUSIONS: This RPE65 mutation, which appears to be quite restricted in i
ts occurrence in Sardinia, leads to childhood onset severe retinal dystroph
y or Leber congenital amaurosis. Affecteds of the other 13 plus two additio
nal families were diagnosed with arRP. This family lived in an area of Sard
inia where none of the others lived suggesting different ancestral origins.