Developmental biology has resurfaced in recent years, often without a clear
ly central role for the organism. The organism is pulled in divergent direc
tions: on the one hand, there is an important body of work that emphasizes
the role of the gene in development, as executing and controlling embryolog
ical change; on the other hand, there are more theoretical approaches under
which the organism disappears as little more than an instance for testing
biological generalizations. I press here for the ineliminability of the org
anism in developmental biology on explanatory grounds. I examine classical
work concerned with growth and development, particularly in Drosophila and
C. elegans. Some of this work is suggestive of modular development, and acc
ordingly suggests a level below that of the organism as being explanatory.
These are not the only type of case. There are other equally well-establish
ed results, which indicate greater integration in the developing organism.
Though with a modular organization the organism can be thought of as made u
p of its constituent traits, and though the explanations of these traits ma
y lie in terms of cells or genes, even with modular development the explana
tions of "genetic" differences require an appeal to the organism. With non-
modular organization the organism has an even more central role. This does
not mean that these genetic or cellular contributions are unreal in any way
, or that development requires some sort of vitalistic contribution; but th
e genetic contributions make sense only as constituents of the organism, em
bedded in a larger organic context.