Binding energy of hydrogen-bonded complexes of the chiral molecule 1-phenylethanol, as studied by 2C-R2PI: comparison between diastereoisomeric complexes with butan-2-ol and the singly hydrated complex

Citation
M. Mons et al., Binding energy of hydrogen-bonded complexes of the chiral molecule 1-phenylethanol, as studied by 2C-R2PI: comparison between diastereoisomeric complexes with butan-2-ol and the singly hydrated complex, PHYS CHEM P, 2(22), 2000, pp. 5065-5070
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics
Journal title
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
ISSN journal
14639076 → ACNP
Volume
2
Issue
22
Year of publication
2000
Pages
5065 - 5070
Database
ISI
SICI code
1463-9076(2000)2:22<5065:BEOHCO>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
The relative gas phase binding energy of the two diastereoisomeric complexe s of R-1-phenylethanol with R- and S-butan-2-ol formed in a supersonic expa nsion has been obtained from fragmentation measurements following two-colou r resonance two-photon ionisation of the complex. The homochiral species (R r) is found to be more stable than the heterochiral complex (Rs) by about 0 .7 kcal mol(-1). The present study also points out two possible reasons for an underestimation of the absolute binding energy when using a photofragme ntation technique: (i) when the adiabatic ionisation threshold of the chrom ophore (here, 1-phenylethanol) is not accessible by photoionisation because of a too large geometry change between the neutral species and the ion, on ly lower limits of the binding energies can be drawn; and (ii) when the sol vent (here, butan-2-ol) exists under different conformers, the most stable form of the complex can involve a conformation different from the most stab le one in the isolated fragment. The lowest-energy fragmentation channel in the ion nevertheless corresponds to the formation of the most stable form of the fragments. In the present case, this latter effect may contribute to an anomalous low binding energy of the complexes of 1-phenylethanol with b utan-2-ol compared to the 1:1 hydrate.