Numerous studies have demonstrated that gene therapy interventions can prot
ect neurons from death after neurological insults. In nearly all such studi
es, however, "protection" consists of reduced neurotoxicity, with no demons
trated preservation of neuronal function. We used a herpes simplex virus-1
system to overexpress either the Glut-1 glucose transporter (GT) (to buffer
energetics), or the apoptosis inhibitor Bcl-2. Both decreased hippocampal
neuron loss to similar extents during excitotoxic insults in vitro and in v
ivo. However, the mediating mechanisms and consequences of the two interven
tions differed. GT overexpression attenuated early, energy-dependent facets
of cell death, blocking oxygen radical accumulation. Bcl-2 expression, in
contrast, blocked components of death downstream from the energetic and oxi
dative facets. Most importantly, GT- but not Bcl-2-mediated protection pres
erved hippocampal function as assessed spatial maze performance. Thus, gene
therapeutic sparing of neurons from insult-induced death does not necessar
ily translate into sparing of function.