J. Haywood et O. Boucher, Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to troposphericaerosols: A review, REV GEOPHYS, 38(4), 2000, pp. 513-543
This paper reviews the many developments in estimates of the direct and ind
irect global annual mean radiative forcing due to present-day concentration
s of anthropogenic tropospheric aerosols since Inter governmental Panel on
Climate Change [1996]. The range of estimates of the global mean direct rad
iative forcing due to six distinct aerosol types is presented. Additionally
, the indirect effect is split into two components corresponding to the rad
iative forcing due to modification of the radiative properties of clouds (c
loud albedo effect) and the effects of anthropogenic aerosols upon the life
time of clouds (cloud lifetime effect). The radiative forcing for anthropog
enic sulphate aerosol ranges from -0.26 to -0.82 W m(-2). For fossil fuel b
lack carbon the radiative forcing ranges from +0.16 W m(-2) for an external
mixture to +0.42 W m(-2) for where the black carbon is modeled as internal
ly mixed with sulphate aerosol. For fossil fuel organic carbon the two esti
mates of the likely weakest limit of the direct radiative forcing are -0.02
and -0.04 W m(-2). For biomass-burning sources of black carbon and organic
carbon the combined radiative forcing ranges from -0.14 to -0.74 W m(-2).
Estimates of the radiative forcing due to mineral dust vary widely from +0.
09 to -0.36 W m(-2): even the sign of the radiative forcing is not well est
ablished due to the competing effects of solar and terrestrial radiative fo
rcings. A single study provides a very tentative estimate of the radiative
forcing of nitrates to be -0.03 W m(-2). Estimates of the cloud albedo indi
rect radiative forcing range from -0.3 to approximately -1.8 W m(-2). Altho
ugh the cloud lifetime effect is identified as a potentially important clim
ate forcing mechanism, it is difficult to quantify in the context of the pr
esent definition of radiative forcing of climate change and current model s
imulations. This is because its estimation by general circulation models ne
cessarily includes some level of cloud and water vapor feedbacks, which aff
ect the hydrological cycle and the dynamics of the atmosphere. Available mo
dels predict that the radiative flux perturbation associated with the cloud
lifetime effect is of a magnitude similar to that of the cloud albedo effe
ct.