According to a common interpretation, Thomas Aquinas and Martin Heidegger,
though moved by opposing philosophical ambitions and having very different
conceptual tools, arrived nonetheless at the same fundamental intuition: th
at of ontological difference, and of its importance in metaphysics. Aquinas
is therefore not guilty of confusing esse with ens, for which the German p
hilosopher had reproached him. By analyzing Heideggerian texts dating essen
tially from the years 1930-1950, together with a representative sampling of
Thomist texts, the A. would like to show that Aquinas' ontology of which H
eidegger had apparently not understood the specificity nor the originality,
belongs just the same to the history of Metaphysics as characterized by He
idegger and such as he would have us go beyond it.