Laparoscopic-assisted vs open colectomy for severe acute colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) - A retrospective study in 42 patients
Ms. Dunker et al., Laparoscopic-assisted vs open colectomy for severe acute colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) - A retrospective study in 42 patients, SURG ENDOSC, 14(10), 2000, pp. 911-914
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be complicated by severe a
cute colitis. Emergency colectomy is mandatory if patients do not respond t
o intensive medical therapy. A minimally invasive approach such as laparosc
opic-assisted colectomy might be beneficial in these patients. Therefore, w
e set out to assess the feasibility and the safety of emergency laparoscopi
c-assisted colectomy in LED patients with severe acute colitis.
Methods: A total of 42 consecutive patients underwent an emergency colectom
y with end-ileostomy. Ten patients had laparoscopic-assisted colectomy, and
32 had open colectomy. Pre- and perioperative parameters, morbidity, and m
ortality were analyzed.
Results: The two groups were comparable for patient characteristics. There
were no conversions in the laparoscopic group. The operation time was longe
r in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (271 vs 150 min; p < 0.0
01), but the hospital stay was shorter (14.6 vs 18.0 days; p = 0.05). Compl
ications were similar for the two groups.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in LED patients with severe acu
te colitis is feasible and as safe as open colectomy.