Evaluation of p21(WAF1/CIP1) and cyclin D-1 expression in the progression of superficial bladder cancer

Citation
T. Liukkonen et al., Evaluation of p21(WAF1/CIP1) and cyclin D-1 expression in the progression of superficial bladder cancer, UROL RES, 28(5), 2000, pp. 285-292
Citations number
52
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
UROLOGICAL RESEARCH
ISSN journal
03005623 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
285 - 292
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-5623(200010)28:5<285:EOPACD>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Immunoreactivity of p21(WAF1/CIP1) and cyclin D-1 proteins was assessed in a cohort of 207 patients with superficial (pTa-pT(1)) bladder cancer follow ed up for a mean of 4.9 years. The results of the immunostainings were comp ared with T category, WHO grade, tumor cell proliferation rate (MIB-1 score ), the expressions of p53 and bcl-2 as well as survival. Sixty-eight percen t and 75% of the tumors were p21(WAF1/CIP1) positive (greater than or equal to5% of cells positive) and cyclin D-1 positive (greater than or equal to 10% of cells positive), respectively. The p21(WAF1/CIP1) expression was rel ated to cyclin D-1 immunolabelling (P < 0.001) but not to the other variabl es studied. The expression of cyclin D-1 was inversely associated with T ca tegory (P = 0.001), WHO grade (P = 0.006), MIB-1 score (P = 0.014), p53 exp ression (P = 0.001), and bcl-2 (P = 0.011) immunoreactivity. In univariate analysis, T category (P = 0.0001), WHO grade (P < 0.0001), MIB-1 score (P < 0.0001) bcl-2 (P = 0.0092), p53 (P = 0.0016) and p21(WAF1/CIP1) (P = 0.009 ) expressions were significant prognostic factors with regard to tumor prog ression, whereas cyclin D-1 was without any prognostic significance (P = 0. 1). Out of 123 p21 positive tumors 21 progressed, whereas only 2 out of 58 p21 negative tumors progressed. In multivariate analysis, the MIB-1 score w as the only independent predictor of cancer-specific survival (P = 0.03), w hereas tumor grade (P = 0.002) and cyclin D-1 expression (P = 0.04) were in dependent predictors of tumor recurrence. Only the WHO grade (P = 0.04) ret ained its prognostic value indicating the risk of progression. We suggest t hat in superficial bladder cancer p21(WAF1/CIP1) and cyclin D-1 immunohisto chemistry provide no additional prognostic information compared with alread y established prognostic factors for predicting the risk of progressive dis ease.