Wl. Tafuri et al., Kinetics of an experimental inflammatory reaction induced by Leishmania major during the implantation of paraffin tablets in mice, VIRCHOWS AR, 437(4), 2000, pp. 429-435
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
In leishmaniasis, macrophages play important but potentially divergent role
s. They act as the host cell in which the parasite may reside and replicate
, and, at the same time, they act as an effector cell with the potential to
eliminate the parasite. In this work, we experimentally induced an inflamm
atory model that provokes a continued recruitment of the monocytes to the s
ite of inflammation. This model was carried out by means of im planting par
affin tablets under the skin of Balb/c or C57BL/6 mice. Mice were then infe
cted with Leishmania major to determine how the monocyte inflammatory respo
nse to paraffin could influence the course of infection with L. major. Mice
were sacrificed 15, 21, 30, and 45 days after infection, and skin and infl
ammatory capsule were collected for histopathology. At 15 days and 21 days,
the lesions induced by L. major in combination with paraffin contained mar
kedly increased numbers of parasites relative to lesions in parallel contro
l animals infected with L. major (without paraffin). Both Balb/c and C57BL/
6 mice exhibited high parasite numbers in their lesions. The intense parasi
te burden observed following paraffin implantation would suggest that the m
onocytes-macrophages that are recruited to the lesion are acting more as a
host cell permitting parasite growth than as an effector cell capable of el
iminating L. major. At later times, the two strains of mice stratified acco
rding to their genetic susceptibility/resistance profiles. Susceptible Balb
/c mice continue to have large parasite burdens, whereas the resistant C56B
L/6 mice begin to control parasite numbers. This later observation indicate
s that the genetic difference between susceptible and resistant strains is
not due to differences in monocyte recruitment and cannot be reversed throu
gh the altering of monocyte inflammation.