The precision of methods using the statistics of extremes for the estimation of the maximum size of inclusions in clean steels

Citation
Cw. Anderson et al., The precision of methods using the statistics of extremes for the estimation of the maximum size of inclusions in clean steels, ACT MATER, 48(17), 2000, pp. 4235-4246
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Apllied Physucs/Condensed Matter/Materiales Science","Material Science & Engineering
Journal title
ACTA MATERIALIA
ISSN journal
13596454 → ACNP
Volume
48
Issue
17
Year of publication
2000
Pages
4235 - 4246
Database
ISI
SICI code
1359-6454(20001108)48:17<4235:TPOMUT>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The maximum inclusion size in clean steels influences fatigue behaviour and other mechanical properties. Hence, its estimation and the uncertainties a ssociated with the estimation are important issues for steel makers and use rs. Here, two methods based on the statistics of extremes, one termed the S tatistics of Extreme Values (SEV) method and the other the Generalized Pare to Distribution (GPD) method, are used for the estimation. Both methods use data on the size of inclusions revealed on the surface of sampled areas. T he influence of the number of sample areas and the way the sample areas are grouped on the estimated result and its confidence limits is determined an d compared. For both the SEV and the GPD methods, the estimated largest inc lusion size is relatively insensitive to the number of sample areas but, as might be expected, the width of the confidence interval decreases steeply as the number of sample areas increases. A key point is that the SEV method has a narrower confidence interval than the GPD method for a given number of sample areas, because the SEV method makes an extra assumption about the form of the distribution of large inclusions. The particular assumption is difficult to justify on the basis of the data alone, and leads to a potent ially over-optimistic estimate of precision. For practical application of t he GPD estimation procedure, the number of sample areas needed for estimati on depends on the confidence interval required and the volume of steel of i nterest. It is suggested on the basis of the GPD size distribution that fat igue failure initiation in a component is unlikely to be caused by the sing le largest inclusion, but rather by more frequently occurring inclusions ne ar the top of the size range. This provides the conceptual basis for a stat istically based design approach in which the estimated distribution of incl usion sizes is used in defect tolerance design of steel components and in c ontrol of steel production processes. (C) 2000 Acta Metallurgica me. Publis hed by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.