This article outlines the advantages and disadvantages of universal and tar
geted intervention programs. Two advantages of universal programs are the a
bsence of labeling and stigmatization,and the inclusion of the middle class
which makes it more likely that the program will be well run. Two disadvan
tages are that they are unappealing to the public and politicians, and they
may have their greatest effect on those at lowest risk. Targeted programs
have the potential of addressing problems early on, and are potentially eff
icient if targeting can be done accurately. Disadvantages include difficult
ies around screening and the possibility of labeling and stigmatization. Th
e argument is put forth that what is needed to reduce the immense burden of
suffering from child and adolescent psychiatric disorders is the optimal m
ix of universal, targeted, and clinical programs carried out in the context
of a civic community. There will always be trade-offs among these strategi
es, and the elements of the combination will change as knowledge accumulate
s. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.