The issue of corporate control is examined through an analysis of the de-di
versification activity of publicly held American firms from 1985 to 1994. P
rominent accounts of such behavior depict newly powerful shareholders as ha
ving demanded a dismantling of the inefficient, highly diversified corporat
e strategies that arose in the late 1950s and the 1960s. This paper highlig
hts an additional factor that spurred such divestiture: the need to present
a coherent product identity in the stock market. It is argued that because
they straddle the industry categories that investors-and securities analys
ts, who specialize by industry-use to compare like assets, diversified firm
s hinder efforts at valuing their shares. As a result, managers of such fir
ms face pressure from analysts to dediversity so that their stock is more e
asily understood. Results indicate that, in addition to such factors as wea
k economic performance, de-diversification is more likely when a firm's sto
ck price is low and there is a significant mismatch between its corporate s
trategy and the identity attributed to the firm by analysts.