Soil physical properties and tomato yield and quality in alternative cropping systems

Citation
G. Colla et al., Soil physical properties and tomato yield and quality in alternative cropping systems, AGRON J, 92(5), 2000, pp. 924-932
Citations number
58
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
AGRONOMY JOURNAL
ISSN journal
00021962 → ACNP
Volume
92
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
924 - 932
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-1962(200009/10)92:5<924:SPPATY>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
The Sustainable Agriculture Farming Systems (SAFS) Project has studied the transition to low-input and organic alternatives in California's Sacramento Valley. This project compares a 4-5 yr rotation of tomato (Lycopersicon es culentum Mill.), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), corn (Zea mays L.), a nd wheat (Triticum aestivum L,) followed by double-dropped bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L,) in the conventional system and oat (Avena sativa L.)-purple ve tch (Vicia benghalensis L.) in the low-input and organic systems. A convent ional 2-yr rotation (tomato-wheat) is also studied. In 1997 and 1998, we ev aluated the transition to alternative systems on soil bulk density, water h olding capacity, infiltration and storage, water use efficiency, and 'Briga de' tomato yield and quality. No differences in laboratory determinations o f soil bulk density and water holding capacity were found; however, in situ water holding capacity was highest in the organic system, lowest in the co nventional 4-yr rotation and intermediate in the low-input and conventional 2-yr rotations. In 1998, infiltration during 3-h irrigations was 0.028 m(3 ) m(-1) for the conventional, and 0.062 m(3) m(-1) and 0.065 m(3) m(-1) for the low-input and organic systems, respectively. Similar results were obse rved in 1997, The alternative systems required more water per irrigation fo r uniform application, resulting in higher soil water content in the organi c systems throughout 1998, Evapotranspiration was higher in the conventiona l systems in both years relative to other systems. Tomato yields did not di ffer among systems in either year. Fruit quality was highest in the convent ional 4-yr system.