Crop rotation and nitrogen effects on normalized grain yields in a long-term study

Authors
Citation
Ge. Varvel, Crop rotation and nitrogen effects on normalized grain yields in a long-term study, AGRON J, 92(5), 2000, pp. 938-941
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
AGRONOMY JOURNAL
ISSN journal
00021962 → ACNP
Volume
92
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
938 - 941
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-1962(200009/10)92:5<938:CRANEO>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Effects of year-to-year variability in agricultural production systems have always been a concern, but few studies are conducted for a long enough per iod of time where management system evaluations and assessments can be made . Given this limitation, questions about whether management systems are eff ective at reducing temporal variability remain in production agriculture. T hese questions prompted investigation of a long-term crop rotation study to determine effects of crop rotation and N fertilization practices in a rain fed environment on normalized grain yields. Sixteen years of grain yield da ta from an experiment with seven cropping systems (three monoculture, two 2 -yr rotations, and two 4-yr rotations) and three N fertilizer rates are inc luded in the study. Grain yields from 1983 through 1998 for each crop and N fertilizer treatment were normalized and then relative grain yield within a cropping system and N fertilizer treatment were combined, which resulted in relative yields for each cropping system and N fertilizer treatment comb ination in each year. Using the normalized yields, overall analyses of the 16 yr of data were conducted to assess what effects cropping systems and N fertilizer have on yield variability. These analyses demonstrated that crop rotation systems are more effective at reducing long-term yield variabilit y than monoculture systems, even with N fertilizer. As expected, N fertilit y, obtained from either fertilizer or legumes in monoculture or rotation sy stems, is probably one of the most, if not the most important aspect in red ucing yield variability. Analyses of normalized yields also demonstrated th at reductions in yield variability could be obtained in many of our croppin g systems with proper management.