Revival performance of growing buffalo calves fed on urea molasses liquid diet and roughage as survival feed

Citation
Ak. Verma et al., Revival performance of growing buffalo calves fed on urea molasses liquid diet and roughage as survival feed, ANIM FEED S, 87(3-4), 2000, pp. 253-261
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
03778401 → ACNP
Volume
87
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
253 - 261
Database
ISI
SICI code
0377-8401(20001031)87:3-4<253:RPOGBC>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The potential of urea molasses liquid diet (UMLD) with two levels of rougha ge as survival feed (Phase-I) and its impact on the performance during revi val period (Phase-II) was studied on eight growing buffalo calves (209 kg m ean body weight, 1 year age) divided into two equal groups in a completely randomised design. In the first phase, the calves of both the groups were o ffered 3 kg UMLD (molasses 84%; urea 3%; mineral mixture 2%; phosphoric aci d 1% and protein pellets 1%) along with 500 and 1000 g wheat straw per 100 body weight in Group 1 and 2, respectively. Protein pellets, which were par t of UMLD were given separately. In Phase-II, animals of both the groups we re fed on similar diets consisting of ad libitum wheat straw and concentrat e mixture (ground nut cake 33%; wheat bran 32%; crushed maize 32%; mineral mixture 2% and common salt 1%) as per their requirements to attain 500 g da ily growth. At the termination of each phase of 120 days, a metabolism tria l of 6 days duration was conducted. The animals fed UMLD along with 1000 g wheat straw per 100 kg body weight (Group 2), though, consumed significantl y more of almost all the nutrients, except comparable DM and OM, during Pha se-I, the digestibility of DM, OM and EE was higher in Group 1, however, di gestibility of other nutrients was comparable between the groups. On the ot her hand, when the animals were shifted to revival diet (Phase-II), the int ake and digestibility of all the nutrients were similar between the groups. The loss in body weight during survival feeding was 187.5 and 16.7 g daily in Group 1 and 2, respectively, which was compensated during revival feedi ng with an average daily gain of 449.9 and 337.5 g in corresponding groups. Though the differences were insignificant, the animals fed UMLD along with 500 g wheat straw per 100 kg body weight(Group I) could not attain body we ight similar to the animals of Group 2. Plane of nutrition and retention of nutrients were largely similar in calves of both the groups during both th e periods. Since, the feeding of UMLD along with 1000 g wheat straw per 100 kg body weight resulted in minimal body weight loss, it can be practiced a s potential survival feed during feed scarcity without any adverse impact o n the performance of buffalo calves during revival period. (C) 2000 Elsevie r Science B.V. All rights reserved.