C. Tiepolt et al., F-18-FDG for the staging of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: Comparison of a dual-head coincidence gamma camera with dedicated PET, ANN NUCL M, 14(5), 2000, pp. 339-345
Coincidence imaging with a dual-head gamma camera may offer a cost-effectiv
e alternative to dedicated PET. The aim of this study was to compare the di
agnostic accuracy of coincidence imaging and PET in patients with different
iated thyroid cancer.
Thirty-one patients were studied after thyroidectomy and radioiodine ablati
on. They were injected with a single dose of 300 MBq F-18-FDG. Scanning was
performed on a dedicated PET system after 1 hr, and on a coincidence gamma
camera after 4 hrs.
Based on a lesion-by-lesion comparison, coincidence imaging and PET concurr
ed in 69% of 118 lesions. Based on lesion size, concurrence was 96% in lesi
ons larger than 1.5 cm, and 62% in those between 1 and 1.5 cm. Lesions smal
ler than 1 cm could not be identified with coincidence imaging.
Identical staging was obtained with coincidence imaging and PET in 26/31 pa
tients (84%). In four patients FDG accumulating lesions were shown by both
the coincidence camera and the dedicated scanner, bur not detectable with a
ny other imaging means and were confirmed histologically on surgery.
Although a coincidence camera is technically inferior to a dedicated PET sc
anner, it may provide clinically useful results in situations were a lesion
of sufficient size and FDG uptake is to be expected, e.g. when evaluating
a known lesion for malignancy.