Transdiaphragmatic pressures generated by phrenic nerve twitches have
been proposed as a means to assess diaphragmatic function and central
drive, but their validity and reliability have not been determined. We
evaluated diaphragmatic twitch and twitch occlusion measurements in a
rabbit model of diaphragmatic contractile dysfunction and diaphragmat
ic fatigue to determine whether 1) diaphragmatic twitch pressures accu
rately assess changes in low- and high-frequency diaphragm trains duri
ng the development of, and recovery from, contractile fatigue; 2) twit
ch occlusion measurements accurately quantify the intensity of central
drive to the diaphragm; and 3) twitch measurements are affected by th
oracoabdominal binding or twitch potentiation. Single-twitch and 20-Hz
double- and triple-twitch pressures accurately reflected changes in l
ow-frequency diaphragm train pressures, whereas only 80-Hz triple-twit
ch pressures accurately reflected changes in high-frequency trains. Tw
itch occlusion measurements of central drive closely mirrored central
drive as reflected by phrenic nerve recordings and only slightly under
estimated the absolute intensity of central drive. Thoracoabdominal bi
nding increased twitch and train pressures, and repetitive electrical
stimulations further potentiated twitch pressures. However, twitch pot
entiation and a lack of thoracoabdominal binding had no affect on twit
ch measurements of diaphragmatic function during the induction and rec
overy from fatigue or on twitch occlusion measurements of intensity of
central drive. Thus, twitch measurements can be used to accurately as
sess diaphragmatic low- and high-frequency fatigue and to quantify the
intensity of central drive to the diaphragm.