F. Birrell et al., Health impact of pain in the hip region with and without radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis: a study of new attenders to primary care, ANN RHEUM D, 59(11), 2000, pp. 857-863
Objectives-To assess the health impact of hip pain at the time of first pre
sentation to primary care, and the influence on this of radiographic eviden
ce of osteoarthritis.
Subjects and methods-Cross sectional survey of 195 patients (63 male, 132 f
emale), aged 40 years and over, presenting with a new episode of hip pain,
recruited from 35 general practices across the UK. Health status at present
ation was determined by a structured questionnaire on symptoms, healthcare
use, and health related quality of life (SF-36). Pelvic radiographs were as
sessed blindly for hip osteoarthritis using standard scoring systems.
Results-The overall impact on health was substantial. Before their first co
nsultation, three quarters of patients needed analgesics, half used topical
creams or ointments, and one in eight used a walking stick. Most of these
impact measures were, however, unrelated to the degree of radiographic chan
ge, though use of a walking stick was increased in those with the most seve
re damage. Health status, as judged by the SF-36, was also impaired for mea
sures of physical function and pain, but the impact on the "mental health",
"general health" and "vitality" dimensions was small. There was a weak rel
ation between the SF-36 scores and radiographic change, with many domains u
nrelated to the severity of radiographic damage.
Conclusions-This study is the first to show the therapeutic impact and patt
ern of impairment in health status resulting from hip pain at the time of f
irst presentation to the healthcare services. Unlike many regional pain syn
dromes seen in primary care, such as back pain, hip pain does not impact on
wider aspects of quality of life, such as general health status, mental he
alth, or vitality. Furthermore, any impact of hip pain in this group is not
markedly influenced by the degree of structural damage. Further follow up
is required to determine whether such damage influences the persistence of
any adverse impact.