Objective: To compare departmental records of deaths after cardiac surgery
with the hospital's information system.
Design: Matched pairs comparisons: (i) historic record compared with curren
t record from another source; (ii) contemporary records from different sour
ces; and (iii) timed records from different sources.
Setting: Regional cardiothoracic units at St George's and St. Thomas's Hosp
itals.
Subjects: 2664 cardiac surgical operations at St George's between January 1
992 and June 1994, 215 deaths in the cardiac surgery database at St Thomas'
s between April 1993 and March 1997, 120 in-hospital deaths received by the
mortuary at St George's during June 1999.
Main outcome measures: The difference in the number of in-hospital deaths f
rom departmental, hospital, and mortuary sources.
Results: Four of 2664 operations (0.15%) had been incorrectly coded as leav
ing hospital alive. Fewer than 80% of the actual number of deaths after car
diac surgery at St Thomas's had been recorded on either the departmental da
tabase or the hospital administration system. For 9% of deaths received in
the mortuary, it took more than 6 working days for the hospital record to b
e updated, and at the time of reporting 1 case had not been updated after 1
4 working days: the date of death was inaccurate in 4/113 (3.5%) of cases.
Conclusions: The mortuary staff can contribute to improving the accuracy of
body counts. Death rates and performance data should not be published with
out statistical peer review.