We address the problem of reasoning about preferences among properties (out
comes, desiderata, etc.) in Reiter's default logic. Preferences are express
ed using an ordered default theory, consisting of default rules, world know
ledge, and an ordering, reflecting preference, on the default rules. In con
trast with previous work in the area, we do not rely on prioritised version
s of default logic, but rather we transform an ordered default theory into
a second, standard default theory wherein the preferences are respected, in
that defaults are applied in the prescribed order. This translation is acc
omplished via the naming of defaults, so that reference may be made to a de
fault rule from within a theory. In an elaboration of the approach, we allo
w an ordered default theory where preference information is specified withi
n a default theory. Here one may specify preferences that hold by default,
in a particular context, or give preferences among preferences. In the appr
oach, one essentially axiomatises how different orderings interact within a
theory and need not rely on metatheoretic characterisations. As well, we c
an immediately use existing default logic theorem provers for an implementa
tion. From a theoretical point of view, this shows that the explicit repres
entation of priorities among defaults adds nothing to the overall expressib
ility of default logic. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.